Township Blocks Rally to Commemorate Constitution Day; Event Deemed Too Political

Andover Park

1851 Center Files Federal Court Action to Defend First Amendment Rights

COLUMBUS – The 1851 Center for Constitutional Law today filed a complaint and temporary restraining order against Andover Township (Ashtabula County) in U.S. District Court in Cleveland. The complaint charges that township trustees’ actions blocking a Constitution Day (Sept. 17) rally on Andover Public Square, by local residents, violated the First Amendment. The 1851 Center, a non-partisan public interest law firm, is representing residents Margaret L. Slingluff, Emily Kobialko and Scott Bankson, organizers of the “Andover Tea Party,” in the action.

Township officials informed the residents that speech at the Constitution Day rally could be of a “political nature,” and thus inappropriate for the public square.

The decision to deny access to the park was made in accordance with a township resolution allowing officials to determine public space usage “on a case by case basis,” and to ban speech that they deem too “political.” However, the park in question is a common gathering point for public events that often have far more political overtones. Officials made no inquiry as to the size of the rally, or other pertinent logistical concerns.

“The First Amendment clearly protects the right to gather on the public square, speak out in support of limited constitutional government, and critique the current state of affairs,” said 1851 Center Executive Director Maurice Thompson. “The government’s action in this case, ironically, demonstrates the need for greater public understanding of Constitutional rights. One way to do that is through commemoration of Constitution Day.”

“The townships’ self-aggrandizing authority to pick and choose who may speak, based upon whether they approve of the speaker’s message, is entirely unconstitutional,” added Thompson.

A copy of the complaint and temporary restraining order are available here and here.

The 1851 Center for Constitutional Law is non-profit, non-partisan legal center dedicated to protecting the constitutional rights of Ohioans from government abuse. The 1851 Center litigates constitutional issues related to property rights, voting rights, regulation, taxation, and search and seizures.

-30-

Legal Center: Gahanna High-Interest, High-Risk Loan Plan Is Unconstitutional

1851 Center Threatens City Officials with Court Action

Columbus – The 1851 Center for Constitutional Law, a nonpartisan public interest law firm, yesterday notified Gahanna city officials it will file a court action if the city moves forward with a proposed $375,000 high-risk venture capital loan fund. The legal center will pursue the case on behalf of Gahanna taxpayers in the event the city council approves the proposed ordinance.

Gahanna City Council recently proposed an ordinance permitting the mayor to contract with the Economic and Community Development Institute (ECDI) for the creation of a venture capital loan fund. The fund would issue high-interest and interest-only loans to local businesses and individuals considered high-risk by conventional lenders.

1851 Center Executive Director Maurice Thompson advised Gahanna City Council against this constitutionally prohibited plan during Tuesday evening’s council meeting. After Thompson’s presentation, council members decided to postpone a vote on the ordinance by two weeks while they review the consequences of the impending legal challenge.

“Gahanna’s proposed ordinance is crafted to assist purely private interests, while placing public money that rightfully belongs to Gahanna residents and taxpayers very much at risk,” said Thompson. “The Ohio Constitution strictly forbids this type of reckless and irresponsible fiscal policy.”

Specifically, the Ohio Constitution (Section 6, Article VII) prohibits the city from “raising money for or loaning its credit to any private company, corporation or association.” According to Ohio Supreme Court precedent, this constitutional provision is intended to protect taxpayers from the risks associated with the failure of a private project.

Gahanna’s loan fund purports to:

  • Use tax dollars to fund private enterprise;
  • Issue loans to individuals who lack conventional collateral or pose a high risk and may have been turned down by conventional lenders;
  • Issue loans at high interest rates of up to 12 percent; and
  • Allow loans to be repaid on an interest-only basis.

In addition, the proposed ordinance would allow the city to recover funds from defaulted loans by seizing an individual’s personal property, including “vehicles, personal items, antiques, collectibles jewelry, or livestock.”

“The city would set up a system where it issues high interest loans to people who cannot afford to pay them back, and then attempt to confiscate personal assets –including homes – in the event of a default,” said Thompson. “This risky investment of taxpayer money in private enterprise is precisely what the Ohio Constitution was designed to prevent in 1851, after a rash of defaults upon government loans to railroad and canal companies.”

The proposed ordinance is the second time Gahanna city officials have run afoul of the Ohio Constitution through risking economic endeavors. In 1984, the Ohio Supreme Court rebuked Gahanna’s attempt to engage in a “joint enterprise” with private businesses, noting that the city’s loans to private entities amounted to an unconstitutional “pledge of tax revenue” to private business.

The 1851 Center for Constitutional Law is non-profit, non-partisan legal center dedicated to protecting the constitutional rights of Ohioans from government abuse. The 1851 Center litigates constitutional issues related to property rights, voting rights, regulation, taxation, and search and seizures. More information about the 1851 Center is available at http://www.ohioconstitution.org.

-30-

Legal Centers Take Up Case of Blogger Charged with Campaign Finance Violation

Geauga County Board of Elections Filed Complaint Against Critic

COLUMBUS – In an apparent retaliatory action against an outspoken critic, the Geauga County Board of Elections charged independent blogger Ed Corsi with violating campaign finance laws. The elections board forwarded a complaint to the Ohio Elections Commission (OEC), where Corsi faces fines of up to $1,000 a day.

Corsi’s blog, http://www.geaugaconstitutionalcouncil.org, is critical of local government and political officials, including Geauga County Board of Elections Member Edward Ryder. Specifically, Corsi publishes a politically “most unwanted list” critical of several officials he refers to as “RINOs” (Republicans in Name Only). Ryder is chairman of the Geauga County Republican Party.

The 1851 Center for Constitutional Law and the Rutherford Institute, non-profit legal advocacy firms, today filed arguments with the OEC on behalf of Corsi. The legal organizations argue the elections board improperly and unconstitutionally applied campaign finance law to Corsi’s activities. Further, the board’s complaint infringes upon Corsi’s First Amendment right to criticize his government.

“This case has the potential to severely limit free speech in Ohio,” said 1851 Center Executive Director Maurice Thompson. “Should independent bloggers in Ohio be subject to registration, political disclosure laws, and fines simply because they discuss Ohio politics, and are critical of certain politicians? The Constitution says otherwise.”

The elections board based the complaint on O.R.C. 3517.20(A)(2). Thompson believes its action overreaches the application of the law and violates the freedom of alternative media, such as independent political bloggers.

“When applied to Corsi’s activities, the law violates the First Amendment right to anonymous political speech,” said Thompson. “It places an impermissible prior restraint on core political speech. And, it applies an overbroad regulation and/or prohibition on political speech that is not express advocacy.”

Corsi’s website and his blogger pseudonym Geauga Constitutional Council (GCC) are not registered political organizations. They do not coordinate with political campaigns. And, Corsi personally pays for all costs associated with the website and subsequent printed material.

A copy of the filing is available here.

The 1851 Center for Constitutional Law is non-profit, non-partisan legal center dedicated to protecting the constitutional rights of Ohioans from government abuse. The center litigates constitutional issues related to property rights, voting rights, regulation, taxation, and search and seizures.

The Rutherford Institute is a civil liberties organization that provides free legal services to people whose constitutional rights have been threatened or violated. More on the Institute can be found at http://www.rutherford.org.

Court: Cincinnati Public Schools Violated State Law

Judge Rules CPS Deed Restrictions Against Charter and Private Schools Illegal

Columbus – Cincinnati Public Schools’ (CPS) policy of prohibiting the sale of unused available public school buildings to charter schools and private schools violates state law, yesterday ruled Hamilton County Common Pleas Court Judge Robert P. Ruehlman. The judge issued the ruling immediately from the bench. [Read more...]

Cincinnati Public Schools Forfeit State Construction Funding, State Legislator Says

1851 Center Sued CPS Over Handling of Charter Schools

Columbus – State Representative Kris Jordan, a member of the Ohio School Facilities Commission, yesterday notified commission director Richard Murray that Cincinnati Public Schools (CPS) has forfeited its statutory right to project funding because of repeated violations of state charter schools provisions. [Read more...]

Prevailing Wage Law Unconstitutional Argues 1851 Center

1851 Center Files Amicus Brief in Ohio Prevailing Wage Law Case

Columbus – Ohio’s current prevailing wage law is, in part, unconstitutional, the 1851 Center for Constitutional Law argues in an amicus brief filed yesterday in the Tenth District Court of Appeals, Franklin County. The case, Ohio Department of Commerce v. 770 West Broad AGA, LLC, exposes fundamental flaws in the current prevailing wage law. [Read more...]

Supreme Court: Health Care Freedom Amendment to Move Forward

Ohio Supreme Court Orders Ballot Board to Certify Amendment Language

Columbus – The Ohio Supreme Court today unanimously ruled Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner and the Ohio Ballot Board abused their discretion and violated Ohio law in rejecting ballot language for the proposed Ohio Health Care Freedom Constitutional Amendment. The ruling is a significant victory for constitutional initiative rights, Ohio’s grass-roots liberty movement, and health care freedom in Ohio. The 1851 Center for Constitutional Law, a non-profit constitutional rights advocacy firm, argued the case on behalf of amendment sponsors the Ohio Liberty Council. [Read more...]

High Court Asked to Address Improper Rejection of Health Care Freedom Amendment

1851 Center Files Ohio Supreme Court Complaint Against Ballot Board

Columbus – The 1851 Center for Constitutional Law, a non-profit constitutional rights advocacy firm, yesterday filed a complaint with the Ohio Supreme Court seeking a remedy for improper actions taken by the Ohio Ballot Board. On Friday, the Ballot Board, chaired by Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner, rejected a proposed health care freedom constitutional amendment. It ruled the Ohio Liberty Council, the amendment’s sponsor, must resubmit the measure as two separate amendments. The ruling requires the group to rewrite its constitutional amendment, and gather two sets of 402,276 signatures for two separate amendments by June 30. [Read more...]

Ballot Board Attempts to Block Health Care Freedom Amendment

1851 Center for Constitutional Law to File Action with Ohio Supreme Court

Columbus – Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner and the Ohio Ballot Board today ruled a proposed constitutional amendment aimed at protecting Ohioans from forthcoming health care regulations should be split into two parts. As a result, the board rejected the proposed amendment and told its sponsor, the Ohio Liberty Council, to start over. [Read more...]

Victory in SpeechNow.org v. FEC

In August, the 1851 Center filed an amicus brief defending the First Amendment rights of SpeechNow.org in its legal battle with the Federal Elections Commission. The FEC viewed the non-profit much like a political action committee or PAC. The 1851 Center’s brief argued SpeechNow.org is not a political committee that makes contributions to candidates, and its subjection to harsh campaign finance laws are a constitutional violation of the freedoms of political speech and association. It emphasized that political speech made by citizens in a grassroots organization is protected by the First Amendment. [Read more...]